Do you think the drone strikes should end Why or why not Essay

Do you think the go strikes should end Why or why not - testify ExampleDrone strikes attacks in Pakistan and other bases should be stopped because blameless lives ar being taken, the local population of both the U.S. and Pakistan are against these attacks, as they do not agree that this is the way buy the farm terrorists. Also, relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan are weakening and such attacks increase the number of terrorists instead of decreasing it. The purpose of the bourdon strikes attack is to eliminate terrorists but not kill the innocent civilians, if the poke strikes attack would has the chance to hurt those local civilians, we should stop using the go strikes and amaze another way to eliminate the terrorists. It has been reported by Dawn.com that the death of 1 terrorist caused by sound attacks conducted by US results in the death of 140 innocent civilians of Pakistan (Dawn.com, 2012). The report even stated that during 2009, a total of 44 bourdon strikes at tacks were launched on Pakistan and these caused the death of 700 innocent civilians of Pakistan and only killed 5 members of the Taliban (Dawn.com, 2012). This has made the accuracy of drone strikes questionable because during 2009, drone strikes attacks were only able to achieve success of 11% (Dawn.com, 2012). For example, the insight for drone strikes attacks is gained by information collected that is not always accurate. U.S. drone strikes attacks may end up killing several innocent populate just on the basis of false information or not accurately identify terrorist targets. Because the drone strikes doesnt operate by human when its implementing the action, once it collected the wrong information even navigate to the residential district, the drone strikes would still make the action because it cant analysis the data but only implement the order. The aim of the war on terrorist is to reduce and eliminate terrorist groups and individuals but using the drone strikes may kill the innocent community. Replacing the drone strikes with foot soldiers is a completely failed idea. Foot soldiers can not be replaced as foot soldiers are aware of the exact locations of the terrorists and they have the ability to make timely decisions to avoid any civilian casualties. Another reason is the drone strikes attacks conducted on Pakistan and Yemen are increasing the number of terrorists and terrorist organization. Baker institute blogs research states that according to Fawaz Gerges who is a well-know analyst of terrorist movements, the drone strikes attacks conducted on Yemen are increasing the number of terrorists as these people want to take revenge for these drone strikes attacks (Baker Institute, 2012). In the same blog, its also stated that Christopher Swift believes that people of Yemen are accepting groups such as Taliban in response to the U.S drone attacks (Baker Institute, 2012).).These researches clearly state that the U.S drone strikes attack is leading to cre ation of more terrorists inwardly the nations of Afghanistan, Yemen and Pakistan. For example, once the drone strike takes place on the basis wrong information, it may end up killing a group of innocent people who have nothing to do with the war. These people do not have any connection with the terrorists. After innocent lives are taken due to drone strike attacks conducted by the U.S., those who are related to